UK. The leaders of the Peasants’ Revolt, Wat Tyler, Jack Straw and John Ball were angry. But Johanna Ferrour was fucking livid!
Originally published by Class War.
Read the full edition of Class War Daily Thursday 02 July 2020: here (pdf file).
On 14 June 1381, rebels dragged Lord Chancellor Simon of Sudbury from the Tower of London and brutally beheaded him. Outraged by his hated poll tax, the insurgents had stormed into London looking for him, plundering and burning
buildings as they went.
It was the leader of the group who arrested Sudbury and dragged him to the chopping block, ordering that he be beheaded.
Her name was Johanna Ferrour.
In court documents she was described as “chief perpetrator and leader of rebellious evildoers from Kent”. She also ordered the death of the treasurer, Robert Hales.
As well as leading the rebels into London, she was charged with burning the Savoy Palace – the grandest townhouse in London at the time – and stealing a chest of gold from a duke.
So why are women like Ferrour largely hidden from popular history, yet charismatic rebel leaders such as the “mad priest” John Ball and Wat Tyler dominate in the history books?
Some historians now suggest that sexist attitudes permeated medieval history. By translating Latin court records, Sylvia Federico, Associate Professor of English at Bates College, was able to establish that women were often at the heart of the revolt.
From records held at the National Archives in Kew she discovered they did “almost everything” that men did – they incited crowds, chased their enemies and marched into London alongside the men.
“They were not shy to pick up staffs, sticks, and staves and wield them against perceived oppressors,” says Federico.
A third poll tax in 1380 sparked the revolt. A tax of three groats, or one shilling, was imposed on men and women, both rich and poor.
For a labourer this amounted to two weeks’ pay. Resistance to tax collectors spread and protests quickly turned bloody.
The revolt ended after the peasants’ leader, Wat Tyler, was killed.
One female leader was accused of encouraging a group to attack the prison at Maidstone in Kent, another of leading rebels to plunder a number of mansions, leaving servants too scared to return.
Theft, looting, and intimidation of neighbours were further charges. But criminal acts like this were hardly noted because of skewed history, says Federico.
Medieval women were seen by contemporaneous chroniclers and later historians as housewives and mothers and not deemed political. If their role in the conflict had been more widely recognised, the revolt might have seemed more trivial, Federico argues.
“The frequency and significance of women’s participation is striking compared with scholars’ silence on the topic.”
Historian and author Dr John Ridgard is also frustrated that there are so few studies on the lives of medieval peasant women.
Despite this, he found reference to 70 women rebels in Suffolk alone. Female rebels were certainly in the minority, a mere 4% in Suffolk, but they nevertheless played a significant role, says Federico.
There were a few women who took leading roles during the revolt but the majority were there as part of the general
The beheading of the Chief Justice John Cavendish for example, came about after a woman – Katherine Gamen – untied the boat he hoped to escape in. Court records state that the mob then “seized upon him”.
Lord Chancellor Simon Sudbury was beheaded.
Ridgard remarks that “two of the men most hated by the general population of England – Sudbury and Cavendish – were both brought to ‘natural justice by women”.
The poll tax of 1380, which sparked the revolt, was much tougher on married women as they were taxed separately from their husbands, regardless of their income or employment status.
But although women were at the heart of the violence and charged with many of the same crimes as men, Ridgard has found no records of women being executed, or punished as harshly.
Historian and presenter Michael Wood says it should come as no surprise that “strong minded local characters were just as articulate and vociferous [as men] in pushing the peasants’ claims”.
But it is surprising, says Wood, that women were involved in the more shocking acts of violence, and it demonstrates their hatred for “the figureheads of an unjust government”.
It must be remembered, he adds, that events like the revolt are usually only told from the perspective of the ruling class and the victors.
“It’s a part of history that has remained unwritten for a long time. It’s not just the Peasants’ Revolt, it’s the whole of our history.”
The axe mark on Simon of Sudbury’s head is still clearly visible on his skull, which remains on display in his home town as a permanent reminder of the revolt.
But as for the woman who played a vital role in his murder, there is no evidence she was ever convicted.
Support Enough 14!
Donation for our work in the Enough 14 info-café (More needed than ever before in times of the coronavirus) and our independent reporting on our blog and social media channels. Even 1€ can make a difference.
Keep the Enough 14 blog and the Enough 14 Info-Café going. You can do that with a donation here, or by ordering stickers, posters, t-shirts , hoodies or one of the other items here or click at the image below.